Since the incidents in the late 70's and 80's with 3-Mile Island and Chernobyl, nuclear technology has resides in no-man's land, between doom and dream, or between problem and peril. Twenty years after Chernobyl, is a nuclear renaissance in the making? An overview of the current status of nuclear technology:
Nuclear peril
- Waste: technical solutions exist, but lack of a political agreement
- Proliferation: can and needs to be managed
- Nuclear safety: an issue for older nuclear plants, but promising 'passive safety' designs for new reactors
The nuclear promise
- The power of the atom: a fistful of matter holding enough energy to power a city of a million for a year
- Climate change mitigation: each major nuclear power station saves 6 million tonne of greenhouse gasses per year compared to fossil-based electricity generation
- Energy security: abundant energy supply when using advanced reprocessing and fast neutron reactors
From peril to promise
- Public opinion - taken hostage by extremes
- Technology: extremely complex scientific & technical challenges need global cooperation and a 'man on the moon' momentum
Conclusion
Nuclear technology needs to address its problems, and holds tremendous promise if it does. The 'nuclear option' does not represent a single option, but offers many choices on building additional reactors, a moratorium ( no new reactors), phaseout (reduce existing reactors), reactor types, waste processing and R&D expenditure.
When excluding all nuclear options, a plan is needed how to build an energy system without it. The fact that we yet have to see such a (transparent) plan may relate to the fact that the numbers simply do not add up without the use of nuclear energy.
|
